W.Va. bill requires drug tests for welfare recipients
by PAMELA SCOTT JOHNSON Staff Writer
2 years ago | 2022 views | 6 6 comments | 23 23 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A bill introduced by Delegate Craig Blair (R-Berkeley) is quickly gaining recognition across the state of West Virginia with Blair leading the way on a Web site dedicated to his proposal.

House Bill 3007 would create a “random drug testing program for applicants and recipients of federal-state and state assistance in the form of welfare or food stamps or both, and unemployment compensation. Any applicant or recipient who fails an initial drug test will be required to pass a second drug test in the following thirty to sixty days to maintain eligibility for or recipients of such benefits. Failing the secondary drug test results in ineligibility for benefit for a period of two years, and requires a mandatory drug test as part of a re-application for benefits.”

Blair states on the Web site, “Nowhere in our state or U.S. constitutions is it mandated that financial assistance is a right.

“Make no mistake, it is a privilege afforded to those in need by the taxpayers via our federal and state governments. I think it’s time that we get serious about the problem of illegal drug users abusing our public assistance system in West Virginia. We should require random drug testing for every individual receiving welfare, food assistance or unemployment benefits.”

The bill is before the House Judiciary Committee and faces cynicism over cost and constitutional issues among many Democrats.

Delegate Sally Susman (D-Raleigh) hand-delivered a letter to Blair’s office of strong disapproval. In the letter Susman says, “As the old story goes, I can only assume someone stole your stationary and then submitted the most ridiculous bill of the 2009 session under your name and without your knowledge.”

“I was surprised the members of your own party did not laugh you out of the House of Delegates,” she stated. “I have to look at the faces of the people who visit the grocery store in my district and those on public assistance are more frequently than not etched with shame, not marred with drug-ecstasy.”

Blair accuses opponents of the bill as being are either “enablers of illegal behavior, drug abusers or the most despicable of all...have a personal financial interest/gain in the demise of a certain segment of our society.”

“Your legislation is an insult to downtrodden citizens who are trying to keep their families from starvation,” Susman wrote. “Random drug testing of people who have fallen on such hard times they must accept public assistance is not only an outrage, but serves no useful purpose.”

The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources reports in January of this year there were 2,924 recipients of SSI related assistance and 6,797 residents receiving food stamps in Mingo County. Logan County numbers are listed as 2,542 SSI recipients and 7,435 collecting food stamps.

There were 443 Mingo County families receiving Aid to Families with Dependent Children and 549 in Logan.

Susman’s letter concludes with a parting shot to Blair: “We can only hope your colleagues will come to their senses and suggest specific drug testing for you, as one response to your Web site.”

Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
fhawk65
|
March 16, 2009
I agree with this bill, and as for Sally Susman comments about Delegate Blair, whats your point, is your county drug free? Why would you defend drug use bought by our state tax money? Its common knowledge that a majority of state benefits are used to buy drugs. How professional was your comment about Mr Blair, I feel sorry for your county. Obviously this is your voting base. Per Dr Adrain Rogers (1931-2005) "You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else." (The Iron Pen)
sherrir
|
March 14, 2009
I totally agree with this bill. if you are gonna receive the money that we the people that work hard are paying, you should have to be clean. I cant do drugs and work my job, so why should someone that is receiving benefits get to sit at home and smoke, shoot up or take pills. Good for WV.

Sherri Prater
ooxxoo
|
March 13, 2009
it is about time our government leaders began working to stop welfare abuse by its recipients. i know welfare is necessary but there are some baby factory moms whose children would be better cared for in an orphanage.

some should have their children taken and cared for by foster parents and their mothers and dads turned out on the steets to work or starve.
Leroy2
|
March 12, 2009
I disagree with Ms. Susman. Many people with good paying jobs are requested to take drug tests on a regular basis. Why should your tax dollars that you pay to help people who really need it, be paid to drunks, addicts, or lazy people. I think this is a thing that should have happened long ago. Maybe people would get off their rear ends and look for work, if money wasn't handed to them to get more drugs and booze. This nation has gotten so Liberal that we have became a STUPID, IGNORANT people.

Lord Help us All.
Angelique2u
|
March 11, 2009
It's about time!!!!!!!

I truly hope that this happens. We (the people who work and supply the money for welfare programs) are subject to random drug tests at any given time. We work hard for our money only to have it turned into food stamps that are traded for drugs or checks that are spent on drugs or on medicaid programs where they get the drugs.
DelegateBlair
|
March 11, 2009
To learn more about this issue or get involved, visit: www NotWithMyTaxDollars com
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: